Hi, The main idea to migrate to 6.6.5(not to 7.6.x) from 5.5.3 is to have smooth upgrade by avoiding re-indexing of the data at this point of time.
Coming to the issue of not able to search the old data(which was indexed with 5.5.3) when we upgrade to 6.6.5 is > The old data search works fine if we use LegacyNumericRangeQuery.newLongRange(), but the same data search does not work if we use LongPoint.newRangeQuery(). Below are the 2 questions running in my mind, could you please suggest on this ? 1) How to overcome the issue to use LongPoint.newRangeQuery() 2) Is it good to go now with using LegacyNumericRangeQuery.newLongRange() and later(after a year, assuming by that time the data exists would be indexed with 6.x only) change using LongPoint.newRangeQuery() when mirating to 7.x thank you in advance! On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 8:53 PM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > First I have to ask why not use something much more recent? 7.5 comes to > mind. > > There’s not enough information here to say anything at all about what your > problem might or might not be. “It doesn’t work” provides little to > diagnose. You might want to review: > > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists > > Best, > Erick > > > On Mar 27, 2019, at 10:39 PM, brahmam <sreerama.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Team, > > > > we want to migrate from lucene 5.5.3 to 6.6.5. > > We see after upgraded to 6.6.5 we are not able to search the existing > > data(which was managed with 5.5.3), are we missing anything here during > > upgrade? > > > > -- > > Thanks & Regards, > > Sree > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Thanks & Regards, Sreeramabrahmam Mob:+91-9535000477
