Hi, Thanks for your response.
Now that in 6.6.5 it recommends to use LongPoint.newRangeQuery() instead of deprecated LegacyNumericRangeQuery.newLongRange(), So Does it means, we need to re-index old data using LongPoint so that it is searchable in upgrade scenarios ? In general Lucene supports smooth migration to one next major version, so now migrating to 6.6.5 from 5.5.3 can be made smooth with the help of existing API changes alone in 6.6.5 ? any guidance on this will be helpful. Thanks in advance! On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, 14:36 Adrien Grand, <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Brahmam, > > This isn't possible: data can only be searched with > LongPoint#newRangeQuery if the field has been indexed with LongPoints. > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:04 AM brahmam <sreerama.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > In continuation to the previous mail, we see for the second point the > newly > > added data after upgrade will not be searchable if we use > > LegacyNumericRangeQuery.newLongRange(). so the second point is invalid > now. > > > > So please suggest on the point 1 how to search old and new data using > > LongPoint.newRangeQuery() only. > > > > thank you in advance! > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 9:37 AM brahmam <sreerama.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The main idea to migrate to 6.6.5(not to 7.6.x) from 5.5.3 is to have > > > smooth upgrade by avoiding re-indexing of the data at this point of > time. > > > > > > Coming to the issue of not able to search the old data(which was > indexed > > > with 5.5.3) when we upgrade to 6.6.5 is > > > > The old data search works fine if we use > > > LegacyNumericRangeQuery.newLongRange(), but the same data search does > not > > > work if we use LongPoint.newRangeQuery(). > > > > > > Below are the 2 questions running in my mind, could you please suggest > on > > > this ? > > > 1) How to overcome the issue to use LongPoint.newRangeQuery() > > > 2) Is it good to go now with using > LegacyNumericRangeQuery.newLongRange() > > > and later(after a year, assuming by that time the data exists would be > > > indexed with 6.x only) change using LongPoint.newRangeQuery() when > mirating > > > to 7.x > > > > > > thank you in advance! > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 8:53 PM Erick Erickson < > erickerick...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> First I have to ask why not use something much more recent? 7.5 comes > to > > >> mind. > > >> > > >> There’s not enough information here to say anything at all about what > > >> your problem might or might not be. “It doesn’t work” provides little > to > > >> diagnose. You might want to review: > > >> > > >> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Erick > > >> > > >> > On Mar 27, 2019, at 10:39 PM, brahmam <sreerama.n...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Hi Team, > > >> > > > >> > we want to migrate from lucene 5.5.3 to 6.6.5. > > >> > We see after upgraded to 6.6.5 we are not able to search the > existing > > >> > data(which was managed with 5.5.3), are we missing anything here > during > > >> > upgrade? > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > Thanks & Regards, > > >> > Sree > > >> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Sreeramabrahmam > > > Mob:+91-9535000477 > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks & Regards, > > Sreeramabrahmam > > Mob:+91-9535000477 > > > > -- > Adrien > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
