Branch prediction would work just as well in the original tests Ken ran, I think. There must be something else going on.
Jim wrote: > It could be due to branch prediction by the cpu. > > Ken Warner wrote: >> Yeah, when I integrated it into my bi-cubic interpolator, it slowed it >> down compared to the logical check clamp. I'm not sure why yet. Maybe >> it was the way I integrated it. I don't know. >> >> In my test suite, the time to interpolate a 944 x 644 image went from >> 1350ms using the logical test clamp to 1440ms using the triple shift. >> I'm not sure why... I work on a real slow (800mhz) machine just so I >> can see these kinds of things better. > -- Peter B. West <http://cv.pbw.id.au/> Folio <http://defoe.sourceforge.net/folio/> =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff JAVA2D-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
