On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 17:58:23 GMT, Vicente Romero <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I realized that this use case (type variable with member lookup) was not >> covered in the test, which was quite the omission, so I added coverage. >> >> I also looked for the other use of this pattern in javadoc but couldn't find >> it. If you can point me to it I'll have a look. > > sorry it is in this same class in method: `attributeDocReference`, not in > javadoc That's the same code before it was moved to the new `resolveMember` method in this change, so we should be fine. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29547#discussion_r2860554996
