This is true and it would be nice if we could opt out of sending the data
like you can in most other programs.



On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Vince O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>
> No nothing has changed that I can see.  Condition 11.1 does
> acknowledge that you retain the copyright to your stuff (which is
> nice).  Nevertheless, it still gives them the perpetual right to do
> anything they want (modify, publish, sell, etc.) with anything (of
> yours) that you post or look at.  The sentence I quoted above is still
> right there.
>
> In that vein, clause 2.3 explitly excludes anyone not in a position to
> grant them such rights from using the software.  Children, therefore,
> may not use this software.
>
> On Sep 4, 2:09 am, "Robert Casto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you look at Google Chrome for Windows - Terms and Conditions
> > Agreement<http://www.google.com/chrome/eula.html>it looks like they
> > have already made the change. Section 9 states that they
> > are not going to do anything "bad" in relation to section 11. Section 11
> now
> > just says this.
> >
> > *               11. Content license from you*
> >
> >                11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights you already
> > hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the
> > Services.
> >
> > I guess they got the message. They made a bunch of other changes and I am
> > guessing there might be more before this is all over.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Christian Catchpole <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > wrote:
> >
> > >http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10031703-56.html
> >
> > > Google backtracks on Chrome license terms.  Google said on Wednesday
> > > that it plans to alter contract terms that gave the search provider
> > > broad rights to use anything entered into its new Chrome browser.
> >
> > > On Sep 4, 1:07 am, "Robert Casto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Why does Google want this?
> > > > My guess is that if they can see everything you look at, they can put
> ads
> > > on
> > > > the page themselves. They won't need to have people put the ads on
> their
> > > > website, they will just do it themselves. This could change how ads
> are
> > > > placed/shown on websites in a major way.
> >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Vince O'Sullivan <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Sep 3, 3:56 pm, "Robert Casto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Are you saying that they now want to own all the data that we
> > > actually
> > > > > > submit through a browser, not just the data we choose to store in
> say
> > > > > Google
> > > > > > Docs or Gmail?
> >
> > > > > It appears to include anything that you so much as look at, not
> just
> > > > > what you submit.
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Robert Castowww.robertcasto.com
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > --
> > Robert Castowww.robertcasto.com
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>


-- 
Robert Casto
www.robertcasto.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to