yes - of course it made commercial sense, but it was annoying.

And I would assume it is heavily updated now. But I wouldn't be
surprised if it was wildly out of touch with what actually goes on in
the industry (as indeed Sun often seem to be - I assume the cert is
still 100% sun controlled with no community input).

On Jan 27, 6:00 pm, Alexis Moussine-Pouchkine <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I think you need to look at it from the companies perspective too.
> EJB 2.x sucked but that's where the $$ were. Most corporations value
> certifications.
> -Alexis
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Michael Neale <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
> > I would be shocked to find it worthwhile.
> > It was years ago that I sat it - and I felt dirty answering obscure
> > questions about EJBs and horrible things that I would never normally
> > recommend or do. I feel dumber for having done it.
>
> > On Jan 27, 2:37 am, kruzty <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Do you think the time and money necessary to become a Sun Certified
> >> Enterprise Architect is worth it?  I would like to know if there are
> >> others here that have done it or contemplated doing it and get your
> >> thoughts on the value (or not) of it.
>
> >> Also, is a book or two sufficient for studying for it or do you need
> >> to take the courses Sun suggests?
>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Andy
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to