On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I ran java posse 227 through the sox tool's tempo filter to speed it
> up by 20% without changing the pitch (in laymans terms: no chipmunks!)
>
> ...
>
> Anyone got some bandwidth left over? I can script automatic uploads +
> run the RSS feed, as long as someone else hosts the files.
>
> Could be a solution for Dick's repeated failed attempts to put the
> posse episodes on a diet. I like em fullsize, so perhaps this is a
> good enough reason not to cut into the discussions.

Count me in the camp that appreciates them "full size", and wouldn't
mind if they were a bit longer from time to time.

The most enjoyable parts for me are when the guys are just talking
about java-related stuff they're really interested in, whether this
means they're going off on a tangent or not. It's always (I think)
more enjoyable to listen to someone talk about something they care
about or have an opinion on, and if it doesn't directly fit with a
news item or extends the episode a bit, that doesn't bother me.

Perhaps if we're looking for volunteers for a technical solution,
someone could volunteer to do an AAC version with chapters broken up
by topic / new story, so that those who are concerned about the length
can skip ahead a bit more easily. Of course, this would only work for
players that support this (not mine), but it might be worthwhile for
some benevolent soul who has compassion for those who are really
concerned about the length.

In any event, I'd rather the posse not feel pressured to constrain
what they may want to say, since I think that would be detrimental to
the quality of the content.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to