Yeah it makes much more sense than IBM buying, although there's still a hefty product overlap, not just on the DBMS side. JDevelper vs. NetBeans, WebLogic vs. Glassfish, BTRFS vs. ZFS etc. etc.
/Casper On 20 Apr., 14:01, Josh Juneau <[email protected]> wrote: > If anyone is going to purchase Sun, this does make sense...and I think it is > going to be good for Java. Oracle has been a huge advocate of Java > technologies. I'm not sure how it fares for MySQL, although in looking at > Oracle's past they will probably just continue to maintain MySQL as an > open-source database. > > Josh Juneau > [email protected]http://jj-blogger.blogspot.comhttp://www.gathereventplanning.com > Twitter ID: javajuneau > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Mark Derricutt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 7.4 billion.. > > >http://www.sun.com/third-party/global/oracle/index.jsp > > > Whose ready for Java 1.6.0.0.0.0.0.14? > > > ...and then Buffy staked Edward. The End. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
