Joshua Marinacci wrote: > It's the same reason we try to ban guns to protect children but not > swimming pools, which kill far more kids.
I understand the point you were trying to make Josh, and this response is way off topic, but a simple google search proves this completely wrong: "In a single year, 3,012 children and teens were killed by gunfire in the United States" Source: http://www.neahin.org/programs/schoolsafety/gunsafety/statistics.htm "In 2005, there were 3,582 fatal unintentional drownings in the United States" Source: http://www.cdc.gov/HomeandRecreationalSafety/Water-Safety/waterinjuries-factsheet.htm ...of which "over 65%" (~2328) were in swimming pools Source: http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/bathing/srwe2chap2.pdf (p13) So guns kill far more children than swimming pools. Then if you factor in all the adult deaths, the comparison gets even worse (30,000 for guns vs. 4000 for ALL drownings). Not to mention it's very hard to walk into a convenience store armed with a swimming pool. :) Sorry for being WAY off topic, but just couldn't let that go by. Paul --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
