Jess Holle wrote: > FX is an end-run around the ME fragmentation issue to a point. > > I say to a point in that there would appear to be times where you really > need/want to duck into a Java library for part of the application's > "back-end". Thus FX lessens the extent of the problem by replacing > direct use of ME with FX, but the ME runtime is still broken in this > respect and still a problem to the degree to which ends up doing any > Java on it. > I was not saying that your FX application doesn't use ME. I was saying that if you have JavaFX, you don't have *any* ME, but WSA, that guarantees the presence of a number of JSRs (media, location, etc.). This means that the underlying ME is no more broken (at least for what concerns missing stuff; bugs are another story).
-- Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/blog [email protected] - mobile: +39 348.150.6941 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
