On Jul 31, 10:57 am, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Congrats on realizing your idea. Feels a little bit like a poor mans
> solution to a problem better handled elsewhere, but since that's a no-

Can you elaborate on that Casper?  I thought its quite elegant under
the circumstances (the circumstances being java).  I didn't know about
these annotation handlers.  So it seems to work well with IDEs and
javac while producing normal artifacts (no runtime dependencies).  And
no build process to run.

It's certainly not as poor mans as "well, just get your IDE to
generate you getters and setters" which is a oh so common retort.

CC

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to