I don't mind the approach of annotations and "language extensions" but it's the implementations that bugged me. Needing to run a separate parser / processor for example. And being out of sync until you ran it.
The benefit to hassle ratio was never good enough for me to want to use something like that. But what I do like is that it looks pretty seemless (apart from not supporting all major IDEs yet). If you tried to ship me a new javac I'd have to respectfully decline. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
