On 20 Aug., 05:51, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > Why don't we just change checked exception from being an error to > being a warning? It would not break any kind of compatibility. And as > a library author, you still get the power to tell your clients that > here's something to pay special attention to, but without getting in > the way of people doing fast and ad-hoc prototyping/refactoring/ > debugging.
Excellent idea, but you could get the same results in a language with annotations and an annotation processor without wiring it into the language. With kind regards Ben --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
