> If you're concerned about hacking > your iPad - you're not part of the target market. Please drive > through.
...or go directly to jail: http://bit.ly/jaIl > (2) Several points brought up in this thread are actually false, which > is a bit annoying. The Apple SDK and tools are free, and are pretty > much state-of-the-art It's a rather bold statement that would require having evaluated a good share of the SDK's out there, i.e. for iPhone, Palm, Android etc. Is it an an assumption on your part (because it's Apple, and by definition must then be superior) or have you actually done that? > Those that have used it have made the point to say that > using it is jaw dropping. I am prepared to be impressed. Which is the same as you are not prepared to be disappointed. > They open source some of their work (like webkit), but If more of > Apple's stuff made sense to open-source, then I'd be all for it. > However it doesn't make sense to their business. Doing that would be > stupid, which they are not. I don't believe open source is on topic here at all. There's a significant difference between not open sourcing and controlling every byte on a consumers device. It's MY computer, I paid for it... just as I did for my toaster. /Casper -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
