On Mar 30, 1:33 pm, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > Are you telling me you don't > think the bezel looks clunky by Apple's normal aesthetic standards?
One, call me a sucker for Apple, but I find the iPad beautiful. Two, I trust Apple of all companies to design a useful product (they have been accused of many things, but "clunky" and "hard to use" seldom pops up). Three, from what I can see on the specs page, the bezel to the left and right side of the iPad is about 2.1 cm each (or about 0.8 inches for our non-metric friends), which is actually about 0.1 cm more than the bezel at the top and bottom of the iPhone. So you as a proud iPhone owner can hold the iPhone in landscape mode and get a feel for holding the iPad. ;-) That may not be enough bezel for my clunky hands, but they probably account for this in the software somehow (ignore certain, permanent touches at the edges of the screen where your hands could lay). > When you buy a new computer and plan to hook it to the Interwebs, do > you also sign a contract with the Internet carrier that says you may > only use this computer and these applications with it? I did - my DSL contract from late 2005 stated that using more than one computer was forbidden. I think they dropped this about two years ago. I'm pretty sure that most ISPs have these "reasonable use" clause in there that allows them to kick out the about 10% of their users that occupy 90% of the bandwidth with file sharing (a person I know is a heavy downloader and got offered a couple of hundred bucks for not extending the ISP contract and never using any services of the company again), so using too much peer-to-peer downloading is effectively banned. Sometimes they ban or hinder VoIP (see http://venturebeat.com/2010/01/08/skypes-ceo-talks-about-accelerating-innovation-and-who-stands-in-its-way/), sometimes they block other stuff (I can't do SNMP, but that's actually my router blocking it). It's Economy 101 - with an "all you can eat" data plan, an ISP assumes a certain volume per customer and loses money if you use more. So apart from kicking of the customers that cost them hundreds of bucks each month, they try to limit the devices - not unlike the "all you can eat" restaurants that put up signs of "In order to keep our prices, please don't take food for customers that didn't pay, and don't take food home". > Where would we be today, if things were like that? Things _are_ like that with "all you can eat" plans, it's just the limits on cable/DSL/fiber are much more relaxed compared against cellular networks because transmitting data in cellular networks is much more expensive. When you violate the conditions of any of these fine products (download too much, use too many devices, use VoIP), the carrier / ISP loses money and will make you pay one way or another. Now I wish I would pay 30 Euro a month and get unlimited data on my PC, laptop, PS3 and iPhone without any restrictions, but providing high-speed Internet access is very expensive, so I don't see this happening anytime soon. And before you say it - no, this does not answer the "Apple controls which apps I can get, and we don't censor movies or games, and I can't find any porn with iPhone/iPad web browser" complaint that's all the rage these days (http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2010/03/15/ Joining-Google). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
