Wasnt responding to any post in particular. Just the topic. On Apr 12, 10:19 pm, Christian Edward Gruber <[email protected]> wrote: > I presume that you're answering the original poster behind my reply... > > Christian > > On Apr 12, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Christian Catchpole wrote: > > > > > This sounds especially bogus because cross-compilation could be both > > undetectable and therefor irrelevant. So if you get your team to > > cross compile by hand, will apple say "you can't write code while > > thinking about another language". > > > It's kind of like saying "don't write code without wearing pants". > > How far can contracts and agreements go? Are there laws (in any > > country) which state that agreements and contracts can't contain > > irrelevant or discriminatory terms? Not that it matters I guess. > > They could just omit that term and reject the apps anyway. > > > Fabrizio used the word "illegal". Is it correct to use the term > > illegal for a breach of contract? Sure you can be sued. But when I > > think of Illegal i think of breaking laws. Actual laws, not "first > > born child, i can write what i want in a contract". > > > And the no-sue terms are saying "the legal system applies to us, but > > not to you". > > > ps. speaking of irrelevant, my cat is now on > > twitter.http://twitter.com/BilliKitty > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "The Java Posse" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > . > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en > > .
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
