I totally agree Furthermore, I believe that this action of theirs is potentially so damaging to their corporate image, public perception and future profitability that shareholders may well have grounds to bring a due diligence suit for failure to protect their long-term earning potential.
Just sayin' On 15 April 2010 18:36, Matt Stine <[email protected]> wrote: > What really bothers me are the reasons for the rules they keep coming up >> with. If you boil them all down, it is to make money. Simple as that. > > > God forbid that a business, whose primary responsibility is to maximize the > wealth of its shareholders, tries to make money. Just sayin'. > > Matt > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- Kevin Wright mail/google talk: [email protected] wave: [email protected] skype: kev.lee.wright twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
