First, yes, I am sad to hear that James Gosling has moved on. Much as I like the idea of James becoming a stronger influence I can't see that happening as long as Oracle controls the JCP.
On Apr 11, 1:13 pm, FloMotlik <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe its no sad news, as he hopefully will engage from the community > side now (not that he didn't up until now, but less bound). Having the > arguably most important person in Java not in the originating company > can be an opportunity. > > I'm sure he will stay in Java ins some way or another and become an > even stronger leader and advocate. Although Java doesn't have the > benevolent dictator model as has Linux, maybe James Gosling could > position himself more in that regard. > > On 10 Apr., 17:41, Cesar Gonzalez <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > :-(, Sad news. I think he will keep promoting and supporting Java, now from > > the community only side. > > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Serge Boulay > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >http://www.infoq.com/news/2010/04/gosling_leaves_oracle > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "The Java Posse" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups > > > .com> > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
