> All of which only requires that it be wildly, obviously better than > 264, in order to justify such a migration, meaning it needs to have > profound advantages other than its political correctness among > everything-should-be-free advocates who, beyond their politics, don't > know anything about digital media. Oh, and not get sued for patent > infringement anyways, whether or not it's true, by bottom-feeding > lawyers and their idiot juror allies in the infamous west Texas > district, who'd love a slice of that Google cash cow. > > Not gonna happen. Zero chance. Move on.
So it happened. Google releases the VP8 video codec and calls for an open-source audio/video stack (VP8 + Vorbis) WebM. All youtube content above 720p being converted and support for all major browsers being worked on. I'm cheering for the unicorns and refuse to move on. I'd like to be able to buy a video camera and not be subject to various mutating restrictions a la what Apple excels at coming up with. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
