Intel was noticeably missing from the slide yesterday. However as Google seems to have partnered with Intel regarding GoogleTV and more specifically, a custom piece of Atom silicon; it would be odd to say the least if they did not support VP8 in hardware as well. Perhaps Intel is just trying not to piss off Apple.
On May 19, 8:23 pm, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > Indeed, great news. :) For the record, supporting browsers appears to > be Firefox, Opera, Chrome and MSIE9. Current WebM members counting > Qualcomm, ARM, TI, NVIDIA, Broadcom etc. suggests hardware support for > VP8 is coming in next-gen chipsets. > > On May 19, 6:41 pm, Dick Wall <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Ah, you beat me to it Casper :-). Good news though, and nice to see > > Ogg/Theora get some thanks for working with Google rather than getting > > dumped on which seems to happen from most people :-). Open source can > > change the rules, let's see if it does. > > > On May 19, 9:31 am, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > All of which only requires that it be wildly, obviously better than > > > > 264, in order to justify such a migration, meaning it needs to have > > > > profound advantages other than its political correctness among > > > > everything-should-be-free advocates who, beyond their politics, don't > > > > know anything about digital media. Oh, and not get sued for patent > > > > infringement anyways, whether or not it's true, by bottom-feeding > > > > lawyers and their idiot juror allies in the infamous west Texas > > > > district, who'd love a slice of that Google cash cow. > > > > > Not gonna happen. Zero chance. Move on. > > > > So it happened. Google releases the VP8 video codec and calls for an > > > open-source audio/video stack (VP8 + Vorbis) WebM. All youtube content > > > above 720p being converted and support for all major browsers being > > > worked on. I'm cheering for the unicorns and refuse to move on. I'd > > > like to be able to buy a video camera and not be subject to various > > > mutating restrictions a la what Apple excels at coming up with. > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "The Java Posse" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "The Java Posse" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
