I don't see how they could. Unlike MS they're not "changing" java.
However - I do see Google as the number 1 reason for us not having a (*&#((* JAVA 7 JSR yet. All because Android is Apache Harmony under the covers, and if they relaxed the field of use restrictions like Apache wants, then Android can call themselves Java without having to pay licensing ( or something I believe ). I'd love to know some more concrete details of the implications ( I could be totally wrong on things here ). -- Pull me down under... On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:13 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > I listened to the latest podcast and there was a lot of discussion > about how Oracle could go after Google because Android is an alternate > java implementation. What is the basis for this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
