So, Android using the harmony codebase is nefarious? That seems like a bit of a strange conclusion!
On Jul 22, 11:42 pm, Mark Derricutt <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't see how they could. Unlike MS they're not "changing" java. > > However - I do see Google as the number 1 reason for us not having a > (*&#((* JAVA 7 JSR yet. All because Android is Apache Harmony under > the covers, and if they relaxed the field of use restrictions like > Apache wants, then Android can call themselves Java without having to > pay licensing ( or something I believe ). > > I'd love to know some more concrete details of the implications ( I > could be totally wrong on things here ). > > -- > Pull me down under... > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:13 AM, [email protected] > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I listened to the latest podcast and there was a lot of discussion > > about how Oracle could go after Google because Android is an alternate > > java implementation. What is the basis for this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
