Oh wow, complete with LINQ like features. But doesn't it look like it
kinda fails at solving the concurrency issues C#, Fantom and Scala are
currently revolving around?

On Jul 24, 11:27 pm, RogerV <[email protected]> wrote:
> Now here's a language the cuts the Gordian Knot of the myriad Java
> language problems by implementing a C# like language to run on the JVM
> - doing so in an entirely Java compatible and inter-operable manner.
> The acid test: You could easily write a library and its API in Stab,
> enjoy using the full feature set of the Stab language to do so, and
> yet devise the library's API to be entirely natural to any Java
> programmer - even to the point of sprinkling in checked exceptions (if
> necessary) via Stab annotations.
>
> The only question is why wasn't this approach taken years ago? We
> wouldn't all be waiting around for Java 7, we'd be busy writing
> enterprise code in Stab.
>
> Despite Groovy and Scala, perhaps there's still a chance for Stab.
> Stab is a compile time static type language but gets rid of a lot of
> boilerplate issues. Many folks just want a Java-like language but
> without the warts and some language syntax and feature modernization
> here and there. C# language has been evolving relative to Java's
> stagnation, and Stab brings the essence of C# to the JVM.
>
> Stab programming language for the JVMhttp://code.google.com/p/stab-language/
>
> The goals used to design Stab were as follows:
>
> The syntax should be readable without difficulties by Java/C#
> programmers
> The execution of a Stab program should be as efficient as the
> execution of the same program written in Java
> The generated bytecode should be usable transparently from Java
> The Java libraries should be usable from Stab programs without
> adaptations

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to