On Jul 25, 1:40 am, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh wow, complete with LINQ like features. But doesn't it look like it > kinda fails at solving the concurrency issues C#, Fantom and Scala are > currently revolving around?
One more comment on this point is that Java 7 isn't going to be bringing anything really new to the concurrency table either, say, like incorporating an actor model. I look at Stab as more an alternative to the language of Java 7 vs an alternative to some other very different kind of language such as Closure or Scala. Of course Stab is more a square on alternative to a language like Groovy too, other than Groovy is a dynamic type language whereas Stab is compile time static type language like Java. Perhaps Stab vs Groovy+ + is the better comparison point. Stab improves over Java language too but does so in a way that's very familiar to us C# coders, while still having a very nice inter- operable story (Groovy doesn't really have any advantage on interoperability relative to Stab). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
