This article is a little more detailed: http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-20013546-265.html
Moandji On 13 Aug 2010 05:24, "Nick Brown" <[email protected]> wrote: > Java lobby has a copy of the actual lawsuit: > http://java.dzone.com/articles/oracle-sues-google-over?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+javalobby/frontpage+(Javalobby+/+Java+Zone > > > On Aug 12, 9:14 pm, Spencer Uresk <[email protected]> wrote: >> Well, apparently, this is how: >> >> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38684074/ns/technology_and_science-tech_a... >> >> On Jul 22, 2:13 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > I listened to the latest podcast and there was a lot of discussion >> > about how Oracle could go after Google because Android is an alternate >> > java implementation. What is the basis for this? >> >> > see this about the microsoft/sun settlement: http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-01-2001/jw-0124-iw-mssuncourt.html >> >> > Does Google have a similar licensing agreement with Sun/Oracle? >> > I just can't imagine that Google would leave itself open to a giant >> > lawsuit as the Dick/Joe suggested. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> . > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
