Java lobby has a copy of the actual lawsuit: http://java.dzone.com/articles/oracle-sues-google-over?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+javalobby/frontpage+(Javalobby+/+Java+Zone
On Aug 12, 9:14 pm, Spencer Uresk <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, apparently, this is how: > > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38684074/ns/technology_and_science-tech_a... > > On Jul 22, 2:13 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I listened to the latest podcast and there was a lot of discussion > > about how Oracle could go after Google because Android is an alternate > > java implementation. What is the basis for this? > > > see this about the microsoft/sun > > settlement:http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-01-2001/jw-0124-iw-mssuncourt.html > > > Does Google have a similar licensing agreement with Sun/Oracle? > > I just can't imagine that Google would leave itself open to a giant > > lawsuit as the Dick/Joe suggested. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
