But GWT goes free, since it has no VM? Good, because I'd hate going to my boss "Sorry, we should probably go back to *sign* JSF".
On Aug 13, 4:05 pm, Jess Holle <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/13/2010 9:01 AM, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > On 8/13/10 15:52 , Jess Holle wrote: > >> I also think this is a broader shot across the bow for anyone who > >> tries to ship something JVM-like without using an Oracle JVM, > >> paying Oracle licensing, or basing their work on the OpenJDK and > >> thus making it all freely available. > > >> For instance, anyone thinking of shipping a Harmony based JVM as > >> part of a commercial offering should take pause. IBM in > >> particular licenses Java from Sun/Oracle but also incorporates more > >> and more code from Harmony. IBM's Harmony usage has every > >> appearance of heading towards eventually cutting the licensing cord > >> to Sun/Oracle -- and this suit serves as a "don't you dare" notice > >> from Oracle. > > And, for instance, GAE? > > Yeah, that would seem like a target as well... > > -- > Jess Holle -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
