Due to continuing inane stupid commentary by Miroslav, Jitesh, and a few others, as well as a bunch of folks engaging in logical fallacies, such as claiming that corporations, being focussed on the money, are all equally bad for a community, I'm abandoning these threads and I'm not going to continue fact checking them - it's too much.
I'll leave this one last fact-check: Sun vs. Microsoft was about their licensing agreement. Oracle vs. Google is about 7 patents, and a copyright clause slapped on that just about everybody agrees is egregious, but in the US system, you throw in a few things you can easily drop to make you look good in a settlement. You can google this stuff, you know? Took me all of 5 seconds to figure out. On Aug 18, 6:23 am, work only <[email protected]> wrote: > was MS i think > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Miroslav Pokorny < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > Which company did they sue for similar grounds ? Given that Sun was > > looking for a buyer, and that included Google, IBM and at the end Oracle it > > would be a bit hard for them to sue G over Android that would be madness... > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "The Java Posse" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups > > .com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
