Excuse me..I never said that all are like that..You must be really
mistaken..No two oraganizations are the same in principles or even their
ways of doing business.

I think you need to cool down and look at other people's perceptions with a
little more courage..

By the way, please dont dare call me such bad words again..I talk with you
with respect and I expect the same from you..

By the way, where have I said that ALL companies are bad.. I JUST LOVE IBM -
MY FAVORITE..AND INTEL..HAVE YOU SEEN THE HUMAN BRAIN SIMULATOR THAT THOSE
IBM GUYS ARE DOING..AT & T.. APPLE AND SUN ARE ALSO VERY DEAR TO ME..I THINK
GOOGLE IS A REVOLUTION..

COMPANIES I HATE..MICROSOFT THAT COPYCAT STUFF..PARDON ME FOR THIS..

I give my replies on a case by case basis, not on the person or company
basis..I said what I felt and I stand by that..

If you think the other way..well, sorry i cannot help you in that except
assure you that this is not so..

Thanks for the information..Seems like you think I didnt read the earlier
threads! :)...!

Regards,
JD



On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]>wrote:

> Due to continuing inane stupid commentary by Miroslav, Jitesh, and a
> few others, as well as a bunch of folks engaging in logical fallacies,
> such as claiming that corporations, being focussed on the money, are
> all equally bad for a community, I'm abandoning these threads and I'm
> not going to continue fact checking them - it's too much.
>
> I'll leave this one last fact-check:
>
> Sun vs. Microsoft was about their licensing agreement.
>
> Oracle vs. Google is about 7 patents, and a copyright clause slapped
> on that just about everybody agrees is egregious, but in the US
> system, you throw in a few things you can easily drop to make you look
> good in a settlement.
>
> You can google this stuff, you know? Took me all of 5 seconds to
> figure out.
>
> On Aug 18, 6:23 am, work only <[email protected]> wrote:
> > was MS i think
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Miroslav Pokorny <
> >
> >
> >
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > Which company did they sue for similar grounds ?  Given that Sun was
> > > looking for a buyer, and that included Google, IBM and at the end
> Oracle it
> > > would be a bit hard for them to sue G over Android that would be
> madness...
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "The Java Posse" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> <javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups .com>
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to