On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Wildam Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am still faster in delivering a project written in VB for many > cases, although there are many good and better paradigms for me using > Java. So I really like more programming in Java but this does not mean > that it helps the customer a lot who maybe is not interesting in > long-term-vision of ROI. That - in my case - is basically summed up > in: There is simply more ready and already there. A new programming > language must go a long way to evolve in any case. That means: There > must be REAL BIG advantages that makes it worth the effort of > switching the language. This might be less relevant for a language > that already offers most of the things I had before. > > Well, I think I missed the distinction to between "new" as in brand new, and new as in "new to you." I agree that there is a ton of benefit to using the tools you are familiar with, but I also see great benefit to being familiar with many tools. That make sense? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
