What does popularity have to do with anything? This isn't a measure of popularity (i.e. "technologies that lots of people know about") It's a report on "technologies that ThoughtWorks thinks you should be aware of, and possibly act on"
If everything in that report was well known, there wouldn't be any need for a radar in the first place. 2010/9/3 Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Jan Goyvaerts <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Any idea why/how/... they consider Java as being end of life ? > > > I would take this report with a grain of salt. Call me cynical, but I'm > always a bit skeptical of reports issued by organizations that have a > financial interest in the content of said reports (Thoughtworks will > probably make more money if they can sell trainings on Java, Scala, Ruby, > etc... than if they only sell trainings on Java). > > To me, the most objective measure of the popularity of a technology is to > search for it on the main job web sites. > > -- > Cédric > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- Kevin Wright mail / gtalk / msn : [email protected] pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
