I agree that there's some marketing in there. However, I think it is interesting to see what they, as a group that might impact how technology decisions are made at higher levels, are suggesting.
I think its also something you can point to if you're trying to convince management that other languages are worth investigating. On Sep 3, 1:39 pm, Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Jan Goyvaerts <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Any idea why/how/... they consider Java as being end of life ? > > I would take this report with a grain of salt. Call me cynical, but I'm > always a bit skeptical of reports issued by organizations that have a > financial interest in the content of said reports (Thoughtworks will > probably make more money if they can sell trainings on Java, Scala, Ruby, > etc... than if they only sell trainings on Java). > > To me, the most objective measure of the popularity of a technology is to > search for it on the main job web sites. > > -- > Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
