Parts of smalltalk made it, via objective-C, I'd still like to see it achieve something based on pure technical merit though...
Clojure rocks by the way, the STM stuff is amazing and you can write the entire language spec on the back of a napkin :) But given the resistance I'm seeing to even small differences between Java/Scala syntax, I suspect that Clojure will be far too radical for most institutionalised Java developers. On 10 September 2010 08:15, Vince O'Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: > It's also worth mentioning that Smalltalk has been hijacking threads > since long before any of these "copycat" languages. :) > > On Sep 9, 11:03 pm, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sep 10, 3:27 am, Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Bonus point if you add [Scala] in the subject of the new thread, but > please > > > stop hijacking threads (looking at you, Kevin). > > > > Would this be bad time to mention how awesome Clojure is? > > > > - Steve > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- Kevin Wright mail / gtalk / msn : [email protected] pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
