easy! It does absolutely nothing, so the obvious improvement in both
languages is not to write it at all...
But if you absolutely must keep the interface (mocking perhaps?) then:
class X(x: Float) {
def this(x2: Int) = this(x2)
}
class Y(y: Float) extends X(y) {
def this(y2: Int) = this(y2)
}
On 10 September 2010 12:01, Ricky Clarkson <[email protected]> wrote:
> class X {
> public X(int x) {
> }
>
> public X(float x) {
> }
> }
>
> class Y extends X {
> public Y(int x) {
> super(x * 2);
> }
>
> public Y(float x) {
> super(x * 2);
> }
> }
>
> Ricky.
>
> --
> Ricky Clarkson
> Java and Scala Programmer, AD Holdings
> +44 1928 706373
> Skype: ricky_clarkson
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Kevin Wright <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I'll throw down the gauntlet then...
> > Can anyone provide an example of Java code that's can't be improved by
> > writing it in Scala
> > Or Scala code that can be improved by writing it in Java (but can't be
> > improved by just rewriting within Scala)
> > By "improve", I mean that the code is better with regards to one (or
> more)
> > of the following:
> > - readability (how quickly can another developer, familiar with the
> > language, understand the code)
> > - maintainability (how much work is involved in a simple refactoring)
> > - thread safety
> > But doesn't sacrifice any of the above qualities.
> >
> >
> > On 10 September 2010 11:45, Steven Herod <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> This thread would be a lot better, faster and easier to read and reply
> >> to if it were written in Scala.
> >>
> >> On Sep 10, 8:42 pm, Ricky Clarkson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Ok, conspiracy theory time!
> >> >
> >> > Reinier, the initiator of this thread, works on Project Lombok, which
> >> > uses annotation processing to add language features to Java.
> >> > Therefore, isn't it in his interest to discourage uptake of Scala and
> >> > Clojure? Could he be trying to assert that all Scala users are
> >> > fanboys to try to discourage associating oneself with Scala?
> >> >
> >> > Of course, I jest.
> >> >
> >> > Ricky.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Ricky Clarkson
> >> > Java Programmer and Scala Fanboi, AD Holdings
> >> > +44 1928 706373
> >> > Skype: ricky_clarkson
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Wildam Martin <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:44, Kevin Wright <
> [email protected]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >> But given the resistance I'm seeing to even small differences
> between
> >> > >> Java/Scala syntax, I suspect that Clojure will be far too radical
> for
> >> > >> most
> >> > >> institutionalised Java developers.
> >> >
> >> > > Somehow this sounds as Java developers are considered as not being
> >> > > very flexible - all the Scala and Clojure or whatever else
> >> > > JVM-language programmers should remember, that most of them probably
> >> > > have been Java developers also for quite a long time.
> >> >
> >> > > Anyway, if it continues that way (if you need to address each single
> >> > > language-fan-boy begging for not turning a thread into trash) I will
> >> > > somewhat stop following the javaposse google group.
> >> > > --
> >> > > Martin Wildam
> >> >
> >> > >http://www.google.com/profiles/mwildam
> >> >
> >> > > --
> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> > > Groups "The Java Posse" group.
> >> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> .
> >> > > For more options, visit this group
> >> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >> "The Java Posse" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kevin Wright
> >
> > mail / gtalk / msn : [email protected]
> > pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright
> > twitter: @thecoda
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "The Java Posse" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>
>
--
Kevin Wright
mail / gtalk / msn : [email protected]
pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright
twitter: @thecoda
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
