On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Kevin Wright <[email protected]>wrote:
> I think the problem is that the premise "law X can't be harming activity Y, > because activity Y still continues" is fundamentally flawed. > Not if it's in response to the claim that "law X is preventing Y from happening". Y *is* happening, so the premise that X is preventing it from happening is obviously incorrect. -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
