Being Java, I have a worrying suspicion which of those three it might be...
On 20 September 2010 23:11, Ricky Clarkson <[email protected]> wrote: > The ideas behind JavaFX (Functional Reactive Programming) are excellent, > and it's not hard to make an implementation even for Java. For Java you get > to choose between compiler magic, runtime magic and a metric crapton of > anonymous classes, but it's perfectly doable. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- Kevin Wright mail / gtalk / msn : [email protected] pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
