Mark, my apologies, this is perhaps a case of English being too ambiguous for what I wanted to say.
My intention was to refute Fabrizio's claim that 90% of developers would be affected by the lack of good Swing support. Therefore what I really mean to say is something like this: the proportion of Java developers who are NOT affected by Swing support is higher than 10%. Does that sounds more reasonable? Regards Neil On Oct 27, 12:07 pm, Mark Volkmann <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Neil Bartlett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Fabrizio, > > > Wrong and wrong again. > > > First, 90% of Java developers do not use Swing or AWT. > > I question that percentage. Maybe my company is an exception, but we > have had and continue to have many consulting projects that use Swing. > I'm working on two Swing applications for a client right now. They > both involve heavy use of JTables with custom table models. > > I do my development on a Mac and deliver double-clickable JAR files to > users that run them under Windows. > > -- > R. Mark Volkmann > Object Computing, Inc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
