On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So why the constant talk about jumping to another platform where you have > > the platform/language but have to start w/ soo much less, just because > Java > > does not have some feature thats in some other language on a non java > > platform ? You seem to acknowledge the eco system but yet you are so > quick > > to devalue and abandon it just because of some life/death language > feature ? > > Not at all, I'm saying I can get by without having to choose between 7 > different logging frameworks and 17 different web-frameworks. Less > might be more for language features, but it most certainly is as well > for frameworks. > > While for average people too many is a headache which is well demonstrated by the simpleness of Apple product, for a developer having 17 different web frameworks is not too many to pick from. I would rather have 17 where it means i can ignore struts and perhaps pick GWT, rather than having the grand choice of the 2 in the official state store. Lets not forget that before there was 17 there was 1 or 2 lesser. Each generation builds on the next, something that dotnet land is having a hard time learning - just take a look at Hanselminutes or DotNetRocks, if its not from Microsoft it does not exist. Yes those podcasts are biased, but many dotnetters also think the same... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
