> For the record, I consider the choice to use Lombok, Scala, Clojure, or > even an all-encompassing framework like Spring to be roughly equivalent in > terms of risk, need for learning, and requirements for tooling support. > > But your not comparing apples to oranges. Languages are relatively small in terms of feature sets and capturing all that in ones mind - Spring on the other hand involves dozens of different technologies. The sum of knowing how many of those technologies work makes for a much larger number of required brain cells as is evident by summing up the total number of pages for allthe reference documentation that Spring supplies with them.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
