I'm still confused. Kenai as run by Sun has been delivering services to a good number of projects with much better QoS than java.net IMO. -Alexis
On 3 déc. 2010, at 10:23, Ricky Clarkson wrote: > No, he said that kenai as run by Sun was an abysmal failure, not that > having Sun run something caused it to fail. > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Alexis Moussine-Pouchkine > <[email protected]> wrote: >> So just the idea of having something run by Sun is an abysmal failure? >> Kenai has been running for a couple of years now. >> -Alexis >> >> On 3 déc. 2010, at 08:00, Cédric Beust ♔ wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Alexis Moussine-Pouchkine >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Of course, you never have this certainty. >>>> >>>> Github's pull model and other social features still make it a very >>>> compelling choice as the public repository of a very visible open source >>>> project, and the fact that Kenai when run by Sun has been an abysmal >>>> failure doesn't really inspire confidence. >>> >>> I think you're confusing kenai (ran by Sun) and java.net (ran by collabnet, >>> payed for by Sun) >>> >>> Isn't that exactly what I said? (that Kenai was run by Sun?) >>> >>> -- >>> Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
