On 3 déc. 2010, at 07:49, Cédric Beust ♔ wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > > Even if Kenai has the ability to use Git as an SCM, its still not > > GitHub, so the network effect is not (yet) there and thus it is a less > > attractive option, plain and simple. > > > > I participate on a couple of open source projects that are hosted at github. > It is nice that you can easily fork and make your own enhancements. The > problem is, these particular projects are run in the benevolent dictator > model so you have no idea whether any of the work you do will be merged back. > The point here is that no matter how good the tool is how the community is > run is more important. > > Of course, you never have this certainty. > > Github's pull model and other social features still make it a very compelling > choice as the public repository of a very visible open source project, and > the fact that Kenai when run by Sun has been an abysmal failure doesn't > really inspire confidence.
I think you're confusing kenai (ran by Sun) and java.net (ran by collabnet, payed for by Sun) -Alexis > > -- > Cédric > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
