On 12/02/2010 09:08 AM, Casper Bang wrote:
On Dec 1, 7:53 pm, Fabrizio Giudici<[email protected]>
wrote:
The bad movie is seeing people declaring Oracle wrong as soon as there's
a controversy, probably without thinking too much.
That's quite an accusation though, don't you think there's been just a
bit much news of this kind lately... projects deeming it necessary to
forking?
Well, I put two precise questions whose answer seem fundamental to me in
order to understand, and saw no responses... :-/
1. Is Oracle right in the claim that they own the Hudson trademark?
2. Did the Hudson community evaluate Kenai for moving? I suppose so, so
that's not really a question. For what reason they discarded it?
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
