> Yes, but the trend is that as times goes on, more and more stuff is user > replaceable and, to stay in topic, at the moment all MBs and MBPs have > both memory and disk user replaceable. So, the original poster is right > in guessing why there's a step back for SSD (a valid argument would be > something technical specific to SSD - I've never seen a SSD thus I don't > know whether it's more susceptible to damage in case of incorrect handling).
I wonder if the whole debate isn't pointless, given that Apple and IOS does not support TRIM commands but instead has their own custom "garbage collection" firmware (like early generation SSD's). Knowing Apple's proprietary ways, that sounds like a neat way to ensure that customers have to go through official channels and pay the typical Apple tax, if they want something that fits (doesn't degrade in performance over time). Just sain'... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
