On 02/11/2011 08:31 AM, Dale Wijnand wrote:
Also Mercurial has named branches (which are simply called branches
in the Mercurial space) which git doesn't have, but I think are better
alternatives to git's light branches in some cases (for instance I would
use them for hotfix commits and release candidate fix commits).
Can somebody please explain how git works without named branches? I
mean, I often use named branches for 'branch-per-feature', where the
branch gets the name of the RFE/bug. How would I do that with git?
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java
Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
