If grails is on the table, then it's only fair to consider lift as well. http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/liftweb/Designer_Friendly_Templates
<http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/liftweb/Designer_Friendly_Templates>It absolutely passes your designer-friendliness requirement with flying colours, but if you're unfamiliar with the FP paradigm then it may not hit your need for "ease of use" until you've gone through that learning curve. On 17 February 2011 14:47, Moandji Ezana <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Lenny P <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Rails-like frameworks fail the designer test, since most pages are >> auto-generated. >> Also, they are incompatible with current way of doing things in the web >> world, >> > > How are they incompatible? > > Moandji > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- Kevin Wright gtalk / msn : [email protected] <[email protected]>mail: [email protected] vibe / skype: kev.lee.wright quora: http://www.quora.com/Kevin-Wright twitter: @thecoda "My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of the ledger" ~ Dijkstra -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
