Yes, that's an 'internal' statement, and a bit of an explanation is in order. We have the current web site project (JSPs in Eclipse), and also we have a web designer and two programmers working on this project, that have their own desires and preferences for the new architecture, and were part of the evaluation. We all thought that Grails (our chosen Rails implementation) was too 'different' from how we want things done, and it doesn't integrate well with the current project and its directory and work flow structure. Most of this was coming from our web designer, and I agreed with it.
On Feb 18, 10:34 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm inclined to disregard OP's research until OP explains why 'rails is > currently not compatible with the way the web world works'. I don't > particularly like rails either, but clearly this statement is false. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
