Based on your criteria for DreamWeaver or other design tool, I'm surprised anything but a template engine would work. Just looking at your list I could rule out G/Rails and GWT. If Lift is a template based framework, then it probably has a good chance of meeting your requirements.
I guess I'm saying that your criteria seem skewed toward a certain type of technology. Not that it is a bad thing, just that your requirements are forcing you toward this choice and people should consider that when looking at this discussion. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Kevin Wright <[email protected]>wrote: > If grails is on the table, then it's only fair to consider lift as well. > > http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/liftweb/Designer_Friendly_Templates > > <http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/liftweb/Designer_Friendly_Templates>It > absolutely passes your designer-friendliness requirement with flying > colours, but if you're unfamiliar with the FP paradigm then it may not hit > your need for "ease of use" until you've gone through that learning curve. > > > > On 17 February 2011 14:47, Moandji Ezana <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Lenny P <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Rails-like frameworks fail the designer test, since most pages are >>> auto-generated. >>> Also, they are incompatible with current way of doing things in the web >>> world, >>> >> >> How are they incompatible? >> >> Moandji >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "The Java Posse" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > Kevin Wright > > gtalk / msn : [email protected] > <[email protected]>mail: [email protected] > vibe / skype: kev.lee.wright > quora: http://www.quora.com/Kevin-Wright > twitter: @thecoda > > "My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not > regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current > conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of > the ledger" ~ Dijkstra > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- Robert Casto www.robertcasto.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
