no matter what happens with native, the web is still there and is critically important. and users want to surf the web. that's the incentive.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Moandji Ezana <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Chess <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Native vs Web will exist as long as there are devices with >> programmable capabilities, and that will continue to occur probably >> long after all of us have turned to dust. >> > > Maybe, but the real question is: what incentive will Apple have to continue > pushing Mobile Safari forward if it directly negatively impacts its revenue? > > For example, why implement > <device><http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete/commands.html#devices>or > make the address book available in some micro-data format if that > diminishes the need for tax-paying native apps? > > Moandji > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
