On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 12:09 -0800, Cédric Beust ♔ wrote:
[ . . . ]
> 
> I hadn't really thought about it but it doesn't seem very relevant to
> the current discussion, unless we can come up with objective ways to
> state that "things were better before we had software patents". That
> seems like an impossible task, so I'd rather focus on what's happening
> today by simply observing that the system seems to be working okay for
> the most part.

The problem here is that only the high profile cases are being talked
about.  High profile cases involve Big Money.  Big Money is where the
patent system works because it is all about offensive and defensive
patents as a business tool.  It has absolutely nothing to do with
protecting "the small guy" and allowing "the lone inventor" to licence
his invention.  In fact it never was about that, letters patent used in
this way have always been about the state protecting monopolies for
their friends -- e.g. their use by Henry VIII.

The cases you need to know about to see that the whole software patents
in the USA system is fundamentally broken are the one you never hear
about -- and will never hear about unless you are personally involved
because of the "gagging orders" that are generally involved.

OK so let's have a data point.  Exhibit A.
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=26aJAAAAEBAJ&dq=linked+list

So now everyone who uses skip lists in any software that has a presence
in the USA is required to pay licence fees to Ming-Jen Wang.

I bet though there are very few people paying the licence fee that is
legally required?  Two of the reasons:

1.  Ming-Jen Wang does not have the resources to enforce the patent.  I
assume he is waiting for someone in the Big Money set to buy it off him
so they can enforce it.  e.g. GIF.

2.  The patent will never stand up in court due to prior art. 

The real problem is USPTO issues patents willy-nilly and abdicates
responsibility to the courts.  USPTO take no responsibility for
researching the application.  At least the UKIPO do proper searches
(though they obey the European ruling you quoted in an earlier email
which says no software patents -- though the EPO have started issuing
some mainly due to pressure from Big Money, which means EU and Asian
corporates as well as the obvious USA ones).

So in the end the lawyers make money.  For the conspiracy theorists, the
USA software patent system is by lawyers for lawyers.  The fact that
they have turned it all into a business tool for Big Money is a happy
bonus that means they make more money.

It all comes down to resources.  If you have them then you are in the
game, if you don't you aren't.  Lone inventors are not in the game.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:[email protected]
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: [email protected]
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to