On 5 May 2011, at 14:17, Markos Fragkakis wrote: > So am I, but the article says that Oracle will continue to lead the project, > which was one of the reasons for the dispute in the first place.
As Miles Parker said: http://twitter.com/#!/milesparker/status/65892886167818240 "In #Eclipse proposals it is typical for one group to initiate proposal and others to join later." There can even be competing proposals that can get merged during the process, so now's the time to get involved if you want to have your say: http://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php?t=msg&th=208592&start=0&S=c7cbbe059e7e5e3722e7fc45f661bc45 You can find more about the Eclipse process at http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process_2010.php and http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Starting_A_New_Project > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
